Schoolgirls subjected to abuse by Banbury Muslim Rape Gang only came forward because ‘it’s better to be a victim than a slag’ says Pig Lawyer

Six schoolgirls subjected to ‘horrific’ sexual abuse and gang rape were accused by a defence lawyer of coming forward because ‘it’s better to be a victim than a slag’.

The girls, aged between 13 and 16, were targeted by a gang of five men at under-18s parties organised by Ahmed Hassan-Sule, who has been found guilty of 12 counts of sexual abuse.

Michael Magarian, QC, for the defence, suggested the girls abused in Banbury, Oxfordshire, only reported the crimes so they would not have to take responsibility for having underage sex.

He said: ‘It’s better to be a victim than a slag. Once you are a victim who has been groomed you no longer have to take any responsibility for anything that you did.’

  • simus1

    Reminds of:
    Why do behavioral scientists prefer lawyers to rats for their experiments?

    1) there are more of the lawyers to work with,
    2) lawyers are more expendable,
    3) lawyers do more harm to society than rats,
    4) lab assistants are less likely to develop a bond or feel sympathy for lawyers,
    5) rats arouse more feelings of compassion and humanity,
    6) lawyers multiply faster,
    7) rats have an innate right to life and liberty,
    8) animal rights groups will not object to a lawyers’ torture,
    9) rats have more dignity, and
    10) there are some things even a rat won’t do.

    What is the only disadvantage to using lawyers instead of rats in laboratory
    It’s harder to extrapolate the test results to human beings.

  • Drunk_by_Noon
    • Lovely man.

    • John

      He looks like a thug

    • canminuteman

      Some sort of wog himself. Magarian ain’t exactly an English name.

  • winniec

    Muslims want to imitate Mohammed whose favourite sex slave was a white Christian. This is a form of jihad that humiliates kafirs.

  • disqus_W6sfZCiOd8

    Michael Magarian is a lawyer for organized crime. Well, that says it all doesn’t it.

  • BillyHW

    The blame lies with the multiculturalists and immigration-mongers. I hope they roast for eternity in hell.

  • Pig about sums that up.

  • AlanUK

    There is absolutely NO EXCUSE. The law in England is crystal clear:

    England and Wales. The age of consent to any form of sexual activity is 16 for both men and women*. The Sexual Offences Act 2003 introduced a new series of laws to protect children under 16 from sexual abuse.
    * For “men and women”, read “boys and girls”. For crying out loud.

    Below 16 a child cannot give consent. THIS LAWYER KNOWS THAT.

    A child under 16 CANNOT give consent, no matter what they are persuaded/encouraged/badgered to say. There is NO justification for an adult to have sexual activity with a child.

    How many times does it have to be said? There is no excuse.

    If Muslims don’t like that, go somewhere else where it is allowed and don’t come back! I hope the Judge tore a strip off him.