Terror War Comes to Europe

Many European countries decided they would have nothing to do with the war on terror. Of course, they made the argument for not intervening in the Middle East on moral and legal grounds, but no doubt they also wagered that they would be safer at home if they kept out of it and left the unpleasant work to others. Yet as the events of recent weeks have demonstrated, none of this has kept Europeans any safer, and now Europe is rapidly turning into a flashpoint in radical Islam’s war with the West.

  • Hard Little Machine

    European governments will of course scapegoat the Jews for this.

  • marty_p

    I am sitting back and enjoying watching Europe self destruct. Please pass the popcorn.
    France, Belgium and Sweden are already a lost cause. The British and Germans can still save themselves but are most likely too bleeding heart and left wing to do so.

    The French (those cheese eating surrender monkeys) may have finally realized that their decades of appeasement of the Arabs – hoping they’d be left to live in peace, may have been all for naught.

    I honestly believe if the Muslims in Europe offered a deal i.e. expel the Jews from Europe and we will live in harmony with whoever remains – the Europeans would rush to comply.
    For those Jews who are still living in Europe – they have to get out before it’s too late.
    It seems the Muslims are completing Hitler’s work and soon much of Europe will be Judenrein, with the remaining Europeans left to be tormented by their new Muslim citizens.
    Let’s hope the Conservative Govt of Canada opens immigration to those Jews who chose not to go to Israel and that they proportionately reduce immigration of Muslims as a result.

    • John

      After events in Ottawa it’s clear that we’re in just as much danger as Europe.

  • glasnost

    Folks should be more concerned about how to defend themselves against the embedded terrorists’ random attacks. One fool with a weapon can control and, if he chooses, kill a dozen or more unarmed citizens in a leisurely manner (fish in a barrel). I’m wondering how many such murders it will take before the citizenry wakes up to realize that the government cannot possibly protect us against this embedded threat.

    In Canada, generally you can’t even own a firearm for “self defense” (just try applying for a PAL and stating “self defense” as your intended purpose). The lefty opposition in parliament is screaming that Bill C-42, which simply amends some administrative provisions of the firearms legislation, does nothing to protect the public and I agree but on a different basis from the lefties.


    The lefties want legislation to protect us from the mythical threat of law abiding gun owners, while I want legislation to help protect us against the existential threat of embedded terrorists. The École Polytechnique Massacre has been the rallying cry of the anti-gun lobby (just watch some of the debate on Bill C-42) and has in part resulted in the current firearms legislation. There is a strong similarity between the École Polytechnique Massacre and the Charlie Hebdo Massacre – armed embedded Muslim terrorist killing defenseless unarmed citizens; so it will be ironic if École Polytechnique remains the anti-gun rallying cry, post Charlie Hebdo (although lefties are no strangers to inconsistency).

    Clearly the embedded terrorist attacks will continue and will undoubtedly be directed at no-defense-allowed locales since they are easy. So what are we individually going to do in Canada to defend ourselves, particularly when we are not even allowed to own a weapon for the purpose of “self defense”. I guess we could start to organize – “Sitting Ducks Unlimited”

    • Raymond Hietapakka

      Guns with bayonets are legal now, in Canada, and that’s good. You don’t even have to put a bullet in the gun if you don’t want to. I think it’s a great option.

      • glasnost

        Isn’t that like bringing a knife to a gun-fight?

        • Raymond Hietapakka

          You have Freedom of Choice. Steel or Lead. There’s a concept called “resisting with equal force”, I believe it’s referred to as. Why don’t Police have bayonets?

      • disqus_W6sfZCiOd8

        It’s a start.

  • Coming to a neighborhood near you.

    The sad reality about Islam’s killers is this; Because Islam makes a continuous claim of religious legitimacy, Islam, as a system, can rely on a huge, unpaid, unseen, unorganized, individually acting, empowered to act, widely distributed group of highly motivated devout believers who are willing to kill in order to keep Islam the way it is.

    These devout believers in reality represent an unconventional unseen phantom army. An army where no one needs orders and each soldier knows exactly what to do. An army where no one is really in control. An army as deadly as any on earth.

    The above is from my thesis “Islam is Fear”. Read it all at: