Radical Islam in Europe: No One to Blame But Us

More hearts of Western civilization have been targeted and hit. First, armed gunmen entered the Paris office of the satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo last week and killed 12 people, to impose their understanding of Sharia on the French. Then, the German newspaper Hamburger Morgenpost, which had the courage to reprint the cartoons, was firebombed on January 10.

Most newspapers in Germany had apparently decided not to risk upsetting Muslim extremists by reprinting anything that might have have distressed them. The Berliner Zeitung, the Hamburger Morgenpost and Der Tagesspiegel were amongst the few exceptions.

Assaults such as these, in addition to a list of demands — from banning Christmas decorations to putting people on trial, if not murdering them, for exercising their freedom of speech — lead one to wonder what further demands might be rolling down the pike, how many, and at what point, if any, are they meant to stop?

These “prophets of death” come with a clear message intended for all of us: This will be the fate of those who refuse to submit to medieval Sharia dictates. If the general coverage in the mainstream media is any indication, they have already succeeded in landing our compliance. And it wasn’t very difficult.


We will not be spared Europe’s fate.

As the Toronto Star was careful to point out in its editorial explaining why it has accepted sharia law governance and will not publish images of its prophet there are now some 600,000 Muslims in the GTA.

Our Muslims are not different than Europe’s Muslims. Their Islam is not different from the Islam of Europe’s Muslim settlers.

It is simply a matter of numbers. The growing size of Europe’s Muslim settler population places the continent beyond hope of peaceful reconciliation.

Muslim immigration must become a political issue.  The grievance mongers have no case to make for it not to be curtailed.

Islam is not a religion of peace. You know that, and so do they.

  • marty_p

    Here is a rather succinct analysis of the effects of increased immigration:


  • jayme

    I was reading a couple days ago about immigration in Ottawa and in 2014 they claim 70% came from the middle east plus 15% from Europe/5% from Usa and the last 10% from other I find this really concerning.

  • Raymond Hietapakka

    …not even a “connect-the-dots” Moahammad?

  • Think of this reality. Western Europeans, who have grown up believing in free speech, living in their own free and open societies, are afraid to talk critically about Islam when Muslims make up less than 10% of the Western European population.

    So now think of what it must be like inside a Muslim society where essentially 100% of the population is Muslim. The fear factor must be at least 10 times greater.

    Imagine a nearly 100% Muslim society, a Muslim society where unseen religious killers, roam literally everywhere. Free expression and critical discussion of Islam within Muslim society is essentially shut off. Shut off by Islam’s dark force of fear. Shut off by the fear of the unseen religious killers.

    This inability to talk critically about Islam inside Islamic society is one of the main reasons why Islam is stuck in its endless cycle of violence. Muslims can clearly see the violence surrounding them. But they know all too well, any critical discussion on the issue might draw the attention of a killer. As a result most Muslims live in fear of a system that keeps them quiet. Inside a system they have no control of.

    The above is from my thesis “Islam is Fear”. Read it all at: http://islamsfatalflaw.blogspot.com/

  • winniec

    The Toronto Star has decided to live on its knees.

    They probably don’t even know why the terrorists claim the right to TERRORIZE…and the Star editors don’t want to learn anything about Islam. They’re ostriches.

    In case a Star ‘heretic’ reads this post, here are the rules you craven dhimmis MUST FOLLOW:


    From Islamic Commentaries:

    -“Insulting the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be
    upon him) is one of the worst of forbidden actions… whether done seriously or
    in jest. The one who does that is to be EXECUTED even if he repents and whether
    he is a Muslim or a kaafir.” – Al-Saarim al-Maslool, 2/438

    -as-Suyuti writes: “(If they break their oaths…) This ayah
    (K. 9:11-12) is used as a proof by those who say that if a dhimmi attacks Islam
    or the Qur’an or mentions the Prophet in a bad manner, HE IS KILLED, whether he
    has broken a treaty or not. Those who say that his repentance is accepted use
    as a proof, ‘hopefully they will stop.’” … (after being killed)

    -“(And if they) the people of Mecca (break their pledges)
    which are between you and them (after their treaty (has been made with you) and
    assail your religion) and DEFAME THE RELIGION OF ISLAM, then FIGHT (Arabic:
    kill ‘q-t-l’) the leaders of disbelief: Abu Sufyan and his host. Lo! they have
    no binding oaths in order that they may desist from breaking their pledges.” –
    from Tanwîr al-Miqbâs min Tafsîr Ibn ‘Abbâs

    -“It is related that a man forged lies against the Prophet
    and he sent ‘Ali and az-Zubayr to KILL him. Ibn Qani’ related that a man came
    to the Prophet and said, “Messenger of Allah, I heard my FATHER say something
    ugly about you, so I KILLED HIM,” and that did not distress the Prophet. – Hadiths

    From Koranic Verses Censoring Criticism of Islam:

    -K.2:193. “And FIGHT
    (q-t-l) them until there is no more Fitnah” (disagreeing with Mohammed), i.e.
    fight and KILL disbelievers until no one expresses disagreement with Mohammed.

    -K.9:11-12 “But if
    they violate their oaths after their covenant, and TAUNT YOU for your Faith, – FIGHT
    (and KILL) ye the chiefs of Unfaith, for their oaths are nothing to them, that
    thus they may be restrained.”

    -K.11.173 “Believers,
    RETALIATION is decreed for you in BLOODSHED.”

    “Those who oppose Allah and His Messenger will be laid low”…with violence.

    From Approval of Vigilantism by Top Islamic Religious

    In 1993, top Sunni religious authorities from Al Azhar
    University confirmed that vigilantes may commit murder in the enforcement of
    Sharia law if the state does not do it. This means every single Muslim has
    implicit authorization from Islam’s top authorities to commit vigilante killing
    to defend Islam.

    From the Sharia law manual Reliance of the Traveller:

    Sharia permits the murder of anyone who
    verbally opposes Islam, since they are at war with Islam:

    “There is no indemnity obligatory for killing a
    non-Muslim (harbi) at war with Muslims.” -Reliance of the Traveller, o4.17, p.593

    • john s

      Look, the star is a rag. It provides a service to people who lean left. That is their right. If you do not like it, do not read it. If you insist on giving ‘newspapers’ special status and believe they will ever be neutral then you are just condemning yourself to a life of frustration.

  • john s

    We can bleat all we want about muslim immigration but it sounds like hypocrisy to me. As long as we continue to import people from other cultures (immigration) we will import their problems. While I can see the need for a country like Canada to increase it’s population I do not see the need for European countries to do so.

  • cmh

    I want to add that even though the cdn government is apparently importing more refugees that declare they are christian not muslim, they are mostly ‘christians of convenience’. Don’t believe a word of it. Stop all immigration and refugee admittance from Islamic controlled countries immediately.