How Has Britain Benefited From Muslim Immigration? Islamists To Hold Rally Attacking Freedom Of Speech

And of course George Galloway is involved. I don’t think the rally should be banned as it perfectly illustrates the danger posed by Islamic immigration into what had once been a free and democratic society.

UKIP criticised after calling for Bradford city centre protest to be banned

“I have raised my concern to Bradford Council that this is not only disrespecting the people who died in Paris but could potentially be very inflammatory.

“It could bring our city further in to disrepute both on the national and world stage.

“All Bradford communities should be protesting against the murders in Paris, not protesting against newspapers drawing satirical cartoons. “This will almost certainly be a disaster for Bradford’s reputation.”

muslims attack free speech2Speaking about UKIP’s call for a ban on the demonstration, Mr Galloway said: “This is an attempt to go against freedom of speech. This is a protest which remembers the dead in Paris but also raises concerns about the way that Muslims are particularly being denigrated.

“The meeting will go ahead as planned.”

h/t ZD

This poster contains an more explicit threat and attack on Free Speech.

The event Facebook page, Our Prophet, Our Honour is at this link.

Share
  • The__Hammer

    Well the UK is a moderate Muslim nation. What do you expect?

    • I should know better.

    • Xavier

      Moderate as in ‘unactivated’.

    • Clausewitz

      Moderate???????

  • barryjr

    So those that were applauding free speech last week are now calling for speech suppression, what am I missing? Yes I am disgusted by the actions of followers of Islam and those that committed the criminal acts last week got exactly what they deserved. The freedom of speech that everybody was talking about last week also included the freedom to say things that would offend those involved in the peaceful demonstrations and the march in Paris on Sunday. Freedom of speech includes people being able to say things that you don’t agree with and it also includes the freedom for you to choose to listen or not as you wish. UKIP had better examine the actions of those supposedly speaking for them and decide if they really want to be tarred as a group of narrow minded hypocrites, whatever the left wing media says about them over this they have brought upon themselves.

    • jayme

      You really think this is going to be peaceful?

      • Xavier

        Oh no. Those demonstrations are going to clash, the police will become involved, the Jews will become involved, and then the whole world’s going to become involved. It may not be a clearly us vs. them conflict, but ‘homegrown’ Islamic terrorism will strike nearly every Western society.

    • Xavier

      If you look at the history of free speech as it relates to religion, (we can take up the Islam/religion discussion elsewhere) in the modern world there has never been a ban or limit on criticizing religion. Only now, since Moslems have begun murdering and using religion as an excuse and shield, are we considering laws to protect religion from insults.

      If those laws weren’t justifiable before, why are they justifiable now?

    • moraywatson

      Again, remember who is doing the reporting. And there is nothing wrong with using rhetoric to voice displeasure. Rhetoric is not the same as using violence or threats of violence to silence others.

  • Pontifex Maximus

    Bella, horrida bella, et Thybrim multo spumantem sanguine cerno. http://rechtsactueel.files.wordpress.com/2013/02/enoch-powell.jpeg

  • Tom Forsythe

    I am disappointed that UKIP would try to stop the rally; you don’t defend free speech by shutting down free speech. Besides, every time they have one of these events, they expose their true nature.

    • Pontifex Maximus

      Mohammedanism does not deserve First Amendment protection as it is not a “religion” but a totalitarian and hegemonic theocracy of sanguinary conquest! It is a fifth column and it must be addressed as such; only the most drastic measures will prevent the West from becoming a third-world ditch!

      • Tom Forsythe

        First of all, the UK doesn’t have a constitution, much less a First Amendment. Second, the right to Free Speech doesn’t come from a document, it is a natural right. Finally, it is essential to provide Free Speech rights to those whose views we find abhorrent, otherwise, it isn’t Free Speech at all.

        • Drunk_by_Noon

          Even to those that wish to end free speech?
          I don’t think so.

          • Tom Forsythe

            If you don’t let them speak, it wasn’t them who ended Free Speech. Let them talk, and then destroy their arguments. It isn’t like you don’t know how.

          • Pontifex Maximus

            You cannot use logic and rhetoric and oratory with such thick ignoramuses because all they do is learn the Kookran by rote; expel them all since it is impossible to have a rational debate with them!

          • Drunk_by_Noon

            Because their argument is that of a reduction in freedom for the rest of us.
            Their message should be rejected and opposed for exactly that reason.

        • WalterBannon

          The muslims are free to speak in a muslim country, until we nuke them.

          Deport All Muslims

        • disqus_W6sfZCiOd8

          I wonder if this rally is really about free speech. It just may be another event to incite the already disgruntled muslim community. It could generate more hatred and result in more violence and murder in the name of islam to your country.

        • moraywatson

          You only have rights up until the moment that you let someone take them away.

    • Drunk_by_Noon

      Why not oppose it?
      The UK already is not a “free” country for her citizens, but the Islamists want to make it EVEN LESS free.
      Absoluteism is a poor measure of reasonableness and the rights of men are not a suicide pact with those that want to end such freedoms.

      • moraywatson

        More islam is never better than less islam.

    • WalterBannon

      Free speech includes the freedom to offend as many people as you can with your speech.

      However that does not also mean that we have to allow muslim colonists in our countries.

      BAN ISLAM

      DEPORT ALL MUSLIMS

    • jayme

      If there is a risk to public safety then yes there would be grounds to ban a protests.

    • moraywatson

      I don’t mind muslims speaking, as long as we all recognize that everything they say and do as muslims is political speech and expression. Political speech gets no public subsidy and no charitable status.

    • moraywatson

      There is a difference between voicing displeasure and shutting an event down with violence or threats of violence.

  • John s

    As a Canadian i have to ask: What is freedom of speech? I don’t think we have it now, and they sure as hell do not have it in the UK so is this a new threat or just more of the same? If I can’t say Gay people are evil, or that hitler had the right idea, or that chinese people smell funny then what difference does it make if I cannot draw muhammed? I wonder why so many people are ok with some speech but draw the line when it comes to others. When the pope suggests there ought not to be speech that offends others does he not realize that talking about the holy trinity offends a bunch of people? When jewish organizations push for limits on hate speech do they not realize that they are opening the door to bans on the discussion of good and evil in general?
    We have grown stupid over the years. Stupid enough to assume that we will always be the arbiters of what constitutes ‘reasonable’ or ‘hate’ or ‘offensive’. So stupid that we cannot even now see that we are about to lose control of the most important element in the foundation of individual freedom and western society.

    • Linda1000

      Isn’t that how Cdn. HRC kangaroo courts got their foothold by prosecuting anti-Semitic graffiti by some skinhead goons? Then there was that Sask. native Indian senator who made some racist remarks. I have to search for links as I can’t remember details as there have been so many HRC cases.
      The French will solve nothing by popping anxiety pills and arresting comedians and neither will Canada by investigating the Tweeter imam in N.S. for making non-muslim or infidel jokes.
      I prefer to hear all sides of a story.

      • disqus_W6sfZCiOd8

        “I prefer to hear all sides of a story.” Or if it offends read/view something else that. There is something for everyone.

  • ed

    90% of british people like jews -90% dislike muslims , from a report just out

    • Drunk_by_Noon

      Link?

  • WalterBannon

    ALL muslims should be deported.

    Inlcuding any who are born here.

    There are no good muslims.

    • Tom Forsythe

      The penalty for apostasy in Islam is death. At the very least, it would cost a person his family and Muslim friends. We have no way of knowing how many Muslims are true believers, and how many are reasonable men and women, going along with the traditions without actually buying into Jihad.

      • WalterBannon

        The penalty for being a Muslim should be summary deportation.

        • pdxnag

          Freedom can be had anywhere on earth. If they prefer it they can create it anywhere.

    • Uncle_Waspy

      There’s no easy way out of this mess. It’s going to get nasty, one way or another. Civil war nasty.

      The Moe invasion is merely a symptom: the disease is Marxism. You can’t merely treat the symptoms. Moes just do what comes naturally to them. The true problem is their enablers.

    • Xavier

      Actually there is one type of good Moslem. 😉

  • Uncle_Waspy

    The issue of freedom of speech has a parallel with gun control: Doesn’t matter how many restrictions they put in place, it will never be enough. They will always want more. And even when they have a 100% restriction, and it has failed to prevent the violence, the elites will just double-down rather than admit their failure.

  • jayme

    Most people in the Uk are on the edge as it is this could push them over that edge.

  • pdxnag

    The moderate Muslim wants the government to do the evil deed of terrorizing folks into (self-)censorship rather than forcing young folks to have to terrorize all on their own, like in Paris. Think of Saudi Arabia as an example.

    They want to use Western free speech to call for an end to Western free speech, allowing only Islam approved speech thereafter, or else.

  • cmh

    Anybody listen to the Roy Green show on the radio? He is a strong Muslim apologist who firmly stated today that freedom of speech should not give one the freedom to insult. He should relocate to England, he would be much happier there. Even 1st generation Canadians can be a threat to free speech…

  • Thinking From First Principles

    Hit them with simple factual free speech. “In Western society, a 50 year old man who married a six year old and used her from that age for “the pleasure of the thighs,” and had full intercourse with her beginning from age nine would be considered a pedophile and subject to arrest as a sex offender. In Islam such a man is considered to be the perfect example for all mankind for all time. Both views cannot be correct. We need the freedom of speech to discuss this.” See if they claim it an insult to simply state the facts (hint – they will).

  • Pontifex Maximus

    A radical Mohammedan wants to behead the infidels; a moderate Mohammedan wants the radical Mohammedan to behead the infidels!

  • Speaksvolumes

    We are at war.