Greenfield: Why is Hillary Clinton Silent on Paris Attacks?

Hillary Clinton is largely running based on her, failed, time as Secretary of State. Not long ago her people were promising a more vigorous foreign policy. But after all this time, she hasn’t even bothered to make the most basic statement about the Paris terror attacks.

In the original primaries, Hillary boasted that she would be there to take 3 AM phone calls. Meanwhile days later, she still can’t even comment on the attack.

We’ve slammed Obama before for his inattention and laziness, but Hillary Clinton seems to be even worse. And Benghazi is a reminder of how her sloppiness and inattention to important details already cost lives…

Share
  • Clink9

    She needs to be elected for America to truly hit rock bottom. Only then will the rebuilding start in 2020.

  • mauser 98

    ol’ Hil is in damage control re Epstein pedo story

    • Exile1981

      I was thinking the same thing, it doesn’t help that her hubby has spent a lot of time secluded with out her at club Epstein.

      • mauser 98

        Hil’ has to pretend she does not know what went on there

  • Jay Currie

    Focus groups take time on something like this…

    But I think Jay Leno got it right. She’s slowed right down. She’s suddenly old. And she is never going to be President.

    • Clausewitz

      Helps also that she has the personal depth of a sponge soaked in water.

  • Norman_In_New_York

    Hillary is not in the best of health. If she were a sure thing to get elected, she would have announced her candidacy by now.

  • We have been going through the Obaama nightmare for several years now, with the world going downhill at a dizzying pace. Another eight years with Hillary Clinton would be much too much. God have mercy.

  • Barrington Minge

    Hilary Clinton is a serial non-achiever so her silence is no surprise.
    Do Americans really want another dud for President?

  • David Murrell

    Part of the reason is that Hilary is singularly inept, as to foreign policy. Recall the Benghazi disaster. Another reason is, to win the Democratic nomination, she has to veer left, to outflank the other far-leftists running. There is a large constituency, amongst Democratic voters, who actually favour the French Islamists to murdered Jews and the Charlie Hebdo team. Think of the U.S. media (e.g. CBC News, MSNBC News, the New York Times) who think the same way. She must try to curry their favour, as well.

    • Exile1981

      Sadly your likely correct in your assumptions.