The No-Go Zones of Europe

“A backdrop to the massacre in Paris on Wednesday by self-professed al Qaeda terrorists is that city officials have increasingly ceded control of heavily Muslim neighborhoods to Islamists, block by block.

France has Europe’s largest population of Muslims, some of whom talk openly of ruling the country one day and casting aside Western legal systems for harsh, Islam-based Shariah law.”

  • jayme

    People say in Canada we don’t have no go zones I am not sure how true that is in Ottawa there are areas that if your not muslim you don’t go to is it as bad as France no but its not asgood as some think.

    • Santos2

      I know there is at least one place in the US where “no go” is a reality. Dearborn.

      • Observer

        Toronto: Dixon Road and Islington after about 10 p.m.

        • Santos2

          Many, many, many years ago I lived near Islington and The Queensway. How is this area nowadays. I’ve not been back since I left.

  • Jason

    It *is* still reversible, even in France: it’s a numbers game in the end and for the time being there are more non-muslims than muslims. But the window of time left for all countries (including those currently better off muslim percentage-wise like the US) to act is closing and the will to act just doesn’t seem to be strong enough with enough of the non-muslim population. Things like the Paris attacks *will* add numbers into our “islamaphobia” camp, I think.
    But we are running out of time in which to act….

    • jayme

      In Ottawa part of the main issue is the left loves that muslims are creating there own communitys in the city core they say this is what Canada is about.

      • disqus_W6sfZCiOd8

        Oh yes, they see multiculturalism and diversity thriving and marvel at their (leftist’s) creation (Frankenstein) and don’t see it for what it is–a monster.

        • jayme

          Its not a good thin no matter how you cut it.

    • Xavier

      Jason, France is 9.6% Moslem now. They do not need a majority to seize control when the government is Sharia-friendly. France, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Netherlanders, and Sweden are lost.

      This is from an article written in 2008, and it’s absolutely prescient:

      “At this point [from 5% on], they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

      When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).

      • Crom Bann

        There are people with the political will to surround the islamic ministates, poison their water supplies, or cut off food, power in winter, drop artillery barrages on top of them killing men, women and muslim children, such is the horror of war. The peoples of Western Europe will turn to the people with the political will. Give the will to act all things are possible.

      • Jason

        Yes, Xavier, I pretty much agree with the picture you paint (not a pretty one), and if I were betting, I would bet that those European countries you mention are lost as you suggest; Canada and Australia seem not too far behind … unless immigration policy changes. But with that caveat, it happens to be a sunny day here so “where there’s life there’s hope”! (maybe?)

        I guess everything hinges on the status quo continuing unchanged, on their being no big shift in public (“progressive”) opinion. But theoretically – *theoretically*! – this could change. The terrible backlash that the MSM keeps whining about really could happen: maybe if the muslims did one egregious, murderous act too many, and enough of those people who are currently supportive of them, turned against them. Or suppose that PERGIDA grew to a point where it was impossible for the ruling elite to ignore it, and they would be forced to negotiate on immigration/deportation/restricting islam. Or if there *are* muslim uprisings (pretty much a certainty, I suspect) and enough of the empowered and progressives in our societies finally get the message that their own power and privilege are threatened and rather than submit (which is, I admit, the likely outcome) they resist with force. You never know.
        I guess in my initial post I was speaking theoretically – we (non-muslims) could still bring superior force to bare, and override sharia advocates by force … if we were more united in this purpose. We won’t, in all likelihood, but could in principle.

  • mauser 98

    3% for American revolution

  • Norman_In_New_York

    If authorities are scared to assert themselves inside the no go zones, then the proper solution is to wall them off and lock in the inhabitants, with checkpoints at every gate that would require those exiting to leave on foot and undergo full body searches. The security fence in Israel has done a remarkable job in sharply reducing terrorist incidents.

    • Crom Bann

      Just prolong and delay the problem, rather than deal with the thing for what it is a war for survival. These are foreign invaders, Europeans have every right to drive them out. Or kill them to the last, if they fail to leave. The Generation of today have no right to saddle future generations out of moral weakness.

  • Hard Little Machine

    In France there are more than 740 of these sharia only zones.