UVA: Not everyone is happy with Rolling Stone’s retraction

Not everybody is happy with the news that Rolling Stone is no longer standing behind their source in their recent article accusing members of a University of Virginia fraternity of gang rape. Here’s columnist Jessica Valenti, for example:

More at Twitchy.

  • The last thing these ideologues want to hear is the truth.

  • Exile1981

    Yes because to lefties the message is more important than the facts.

  • Pete_Brewster

    Pleased to see your one at Jezebel admitting she was wrong, if only because if “Jackie’s” lost Jezebel all that still needs doing is to publish Jackie’s real name and address, so something resembling justice can be served.

    Too bad Jezebel won’t learn from their mistake.

  • Sean

    I bathe in Jessica Valenti’s tears.

  • Gaylord Ponce

    So, this sow is disappointed Jackie wasn’t raped?

    • Pete_Brewster

      She’s angry she and her coven were made to look like the birdbrains they are by brave souls in the blogosphere who immediately recognized the RS article to be hack fiction.

      Imagine not being able to slander the sons of the boys who snubbed you at university because you were a fat, ugly, spoiled little shrew who wasn’t half as smart as you thought you were. Where will it all end?

  • Perhaps Miss Valenti would like to examine the loads of evidence of sexual slavery and exploitation of her more sallow and brown sisters instead of stories some hack writer has hashed up.

  • Hard Little Machine

    On the other hand, using this to claim that sexual violence does not exist would be insane.