The Search for Racism

The self-appointed champions of “civil rights” render the term racism increasingly meaningless. Where juries see self-defense, they see homicidal racial animus. They turn aggressors into victims and demand that society accord the victims the status of heroes, deserving of memorials in public schools, a suggestion that the White House recently touted for Michael Brown.

A desire for power, not justice, is driving their protests. Their willingness to commit injustices during the protests underscores their lack of interest in justice. They are perfectly willing to harm innocent people for the sake of attaining power. “No justice, no peace” is just a slogan for new injustices. It is a slogan that leads to everything from looting and burning down buildings to disrupting traffic with “die-ins” to throwing police officers in prison for acts of self-defense.

It is not that the Ferguson protesters have a good end but select bad means to achieve it. Their end isn’t even good. It is simply raw power, and if they got it, they would use that power to commit fresh injustices.

This is what makes the “national conversation on race” so hopeless. It has nothing to do with the truth and couldn’t possibly culminate in a better society…

h/t Marvin

Share
  • Rosenmops

    The “civil rights” establishment can’t find enough authentic racism to stay in business, so it has to turn to self-defense cases and scaremongering about “subtle racism” for survival.

    And Obama and Holder are at the head of the pack.

    • Pete_Brewster

      Oh, there’s plenty of racism to be found. If you’re one of the groups who thrust Obama into office you can talk all the trash about peckerwoods and Jews you please.

      Our masters have no objection to this because they hate us as much as the urban riffraff do, and can’t wait for that happy day when they see us in hell.

  • mauser 98

    ….pot calls kettle black
    …SPLC writer David Ruenzel killed by blacks

    Ruenzel was writing about white privilege for the Southern Poverty Law Center as far back as 1997
    “As a writer for the Southern Poverty Law Center, one of this favorite
    topics was rooting out racism. And how white racism is permanent. White
    racism is everywhere. And white racism explains everything.”

    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2014/12/black_crime_claims_life_of_apologist_for_black_crime.html

    • Frau Katze

      I have a theory that blacks, on average, are more violent. It’s biological IMO. It’s based on observing 1) massive violence in Africa itself, and 2) higher crimes among blacks in the West.

      The institutional racism excuse is garbage. Consider the Chinese. When they first came to North America they were subject to strong white racism. It’s much, much less now…and the Chinese tend to be successful and not particularly violent.

      So where did the institutional racism go for them? As a group, they’re doing very well. There is some kind of biological difference.

      • mauser 98

        could be..a good friend works in Nigeria.. says it is a hellhole you cannot imagine.
        no mention of above murder on SPLC site
        they have a hate map
        http://www.splcenter.org/get-informed/hate-map

        • Frau Katze

          Too embarrassing to mention?

      • jayme

        I think in part there brain washed into thinking no matter what happens is racism.

      • Exile1981

        There is a gene that makes people less likely to use violence and more likely to co-operate as it allowed civilization to progress beyond the tribal level. There is some indication that this gene works by making people more willing to accept hardship for the long term benefits to society. The suggestion is it is available in 2 forms. Those with form 1 will work as a group for the betterment of the group, those with the second type are willing to accept a greater level of hardship if it is sold as a benefit to society.

        Those without the gene are likely to always be looking for an angle for themselves, are more likely to use violence to take what they want and tend to live for today and not care about others unless they can use them. They see violence as a good thing as it equals strength and the acquisition of stuff. They will team up with a strong leader as long as they are getting stuff but if there is weakness in the leader they will turn on them.

        I’ve read that certain ethnic backgrounds are more likely to actually have a copy of the gene than others while some do not have it at all.

        • Rosenmops

          I remember reading about that. Something like 10% of blacks have the form of the gene that makes them more violent compared to less than 1% of whites and Asians. Probably it is that 10% makes up the ghetto blacks and criminals.

          • Exile1981

            I think it’s two different things. There is a hyper aggression gene and there is a gene that encourages co-operative work and putting society before yourself – If I remember right they call it the civilization gene as our civilizations all required that sort of cooperation.

            Not having it encourages tribal behavior.