This photo did NOT accompany the op-ed
The recent protests in Venezuela have made international headlines. Much of the foreign media coverage has distorted the reality of my country and the facts surrounding the events.
Venezuelans are proud of our democracy. We have built a participatory democratic movement from the grass roots that has ensured that both power and resources are equitably distributed among our people.
According to the United Nations, Venezuela has consistently reduced inequality: It now has the lowest income inequality in the region. We have reduced poverty enormously — to 25.4% in 2012, on the World Bank’s data, from 49% in 1998; in the same period, according to government statistics, extreme poverty diminished to 6% from 21%.
We have created flagship universal health care and education programs, free to our citizens nationwide. We have achieved these feats in large part by using revenue from Venezuelan oil.
While our social policies have improved citizens’ lives over all, the government has also confronted serious economic challenges in the past 16 months, including inflation and shortages of basic goods. We continue to find solutions through measures like our new market-based foreign exchange system, which is designed to reduce the black market exchange rate. And we are monitoring businesses to ensure they are not gouging consumers or hoarding products. Venezuela has also struggled with a high crime rate. We are addressing this by building a new national police force, strengthening community-police cooperation and revamping our prison system.
Since 1998, the movement founded by Hugo Chávez has won more than a dozen presidential, parliamentary and local elections through an electoral process that former American President Jimmy Carter has called “the best in the world.”
Popular participation in politics in Venezuela has increased dramatically over the past decade. As a former union organizer, I believe profoundly in the right to association and in the civic duty to ensure that justice prevails by voicing legitimate concerns through peaceful assembly and protest.
The claims that Venezuela has a deficient democracy and that current protests represent mainstream sentiment are belied by the facts. The antigovernment protests are being carried out by people in the wealthier segments of society who seek to reverse the gains of the democratic process that have benefited the vast majority of the people.
Antigovernment protesters have physically attacked and damaged health care clinics, burned down a university in Táchira State and thrown Molotov cocktails and rocks at buses. They have also targeted other public institutions by throwing rocks and torches at the offices of the Supreme Court, the public telephone company CANTV and the attorney general’s office. These violent actions have caused many millions of dollars’ worth of damage. This is why the protests have received no support in poor and working-class neighborhoods.
The protesters have a single goal: the unconstitutional ouster of the democratically elected government. Antigovernment leaders made this clear when they started the campaign in January, vowing to create chaos in the streets. Those with legitimate criticisms of economic conditions or the crime rate are being exploited by protest leaders with a violent, antidemocratic agenda.
In two months, a reported 36 people have been killed. The protesters are, we believe, directly responsible for about half of the fatalities. Six members of the National Guard have been shot and killed; other citizens have been murdered while attempting to remove obstacles placed by protesters to block transit.
A very small number of security forces personnel have also been accused of engaging in violence, as a result of which several people have died. These are highly regrettable events, and the Venezuelan government has responded by arresting those suspected. We have created a Human Rights Council to investigate all incidents related to these protests. Each victim deserves justice, and every perpetrator — whether a supporter or an opponent of the government — will be held accountable for his or her actions.
In the United States, the protesters have been described as “peaceful,” while the Venezuelan government is said to be violently repressing them. According to this narrative, the American government is siding with the people of Venezuela; in reality, it is on the side of the 1 percent who wish to drag our country back to when the 99 percent were shut out of political life and only the few — including American companies — benefited from Venezuela’s oil.
Let’s not forget that some of those who supported ousting Venezuela’s democratically elected government in 2002 are leading the protests today. Those involved in the 2002 coup immediately disbanded the Supreme Court and the legislature, and scrapped the Constitution. Those who incite violence and attempt similar unconstitutional actions today must face the justice system.
The American government supported the 2002 coup and recognized the coup government despite its anti-democratic behavior. Today, the Obama administration spends at least $5 million annually to support opposition movements in Venezuela. A bill calling for an additional $15 million for these anti-government organizations is now in Congress. Congress is also deciding whether to impose sanctions on Venezuela. I hope that the American people, knowing the truth, will decide that Venezuela and its people do not deserve such punishment, and will call upon their representatives not to enact sanctions.
Now is a time for dialogue and diplomacy. Within Venezuela, we have extended a hand to the opposition. And we have accepted the Union of South American Nations’ recommendations to engage in mediated talks with the opposition. My government has also reached out to President Obama, expressing our desire to again exchange ambassadors. We hope his administration will respond in kind.
Venezuela needs peace and dialogue to move forward. We welcome anyone who sincerely wants to help us reach these goals.
* * *
Comments are mixed. There are many people from South America living in the US and NYT cannot fool them. Sample:
Way to go, NYT. Who is next, Mugabe? Kim Jong-un? Fidel Castro? I understand and support a forum that strives to give all parties a voice where issues can be debated democratically by anyone interested. A very different one is inviting official government propaganda into this type of forums. I doubt Maduro’s credibility will be improved by this op-ed piece. Facts and actions speak much louder than all these empty words. I still cannot believe the NYT is acting as supporter of a regime that just a few years from now will be remembered for all the wrong reasons, once the body count in Venezuela reaches much higher levels than the current one and the situation deteriorates even further.
Another from “Eduardo” who says he is in Venezuela:
What a cynic asking for dialog when he has throw away American diplomats from Venezuela put into prison several opposition leaders and trying to silent opposition deputed Maria Corina Machado removing her parliamentary immunity and keeping her out from congress and the most grave he is the direct responsible for all the students been assassinated recently ignoring their legitimate rights to protest pacifically on the streets. Seems to be very desperate, playing his last card of a dirty game trying to show a “democratic” innocent but much faked face to the world.
There are quite a few more like that, although I have not the time to read them all. NYT also features “Picks” that the comment moderators like. Here is one, a conspiracy theorist, apparently:
I support what president Maduro has said, I have been studying what is going on in Venezuela for a while now and I found out that even though there are some problems with supply of goods and inflation, what is really behind all the protests are the old powerful opposition leaders in conjunction with the U.S government who want to seize the nation’s power once again, they have called for violent protesting, however, there is a small group that instead creates violence and chaos in the streets instead of protesting pacifically like other opposition people. It is no coincidence that they are using the same methods as with Allende to overthrow the government, having food companies hiding the food or trafficking the food through the borders of the nation because it was more profitable. The government has been overcoming these through dialogue with the private and public sector of businesses.