Let the Riots Begin! Mohammed And The Hooker Pigs!

Well we were had by Mike Adams his column is satire. Truth be told I was had by my own desire to mock the MSM and the lefties. Blogger Sleeping Beastly has set us straight.

Mike Adams responded to my e-mail asking confirmation:

Adams, Mike to me show details 4:41 PM (19 minutes ago)

Pure satire!


msa


“Tolerance is the virtue of a man without convictions.” – G.K. Chesterton.

Upperdate: Initially I thought it possible that Enrique Chagoya was lying out of fear of the Fabled Muslim Backlash when he issued a denial/explanation indicating that the painting, shown below, does not represent Mohammed but is in fact a depiction of Jesus. Personally I do not doubt that Chagoya is telling the truth regarding this specific image.
Chagoya Explanation: Prof. Chagoya responded to blogger Lenny’s request for verification and denied the specific image (below) was Mohammed and instead was another representation of Christ.

“First of all there are no representations of the prophet Mohamed. In my book my original source is actually coming from a representation of Jesus in a Persian Manuscript from the 17th Century reproduced in an [Newsweek, March 27, 2000] article by Kenneth L. Woodward in March 27 2000. In my book it represents the spiritual represented by the Persian illustration of Jesus) protecting himself from temptation with flames around him (the pig ladies are the symbol of temptation in my book). In the online version there are no illustrations but the article matches the hard copy.”

Original Post Below:

Media bias? C’mon it’s art.

Quite a story, to date this controversy has centred solely on artist Enrique Chagoya’s pornographic depictions of Jesus, overlooked was the work on display here which shows Mohammed at play with 2 Hooker Pigs.

Let’s see what the “hypocrites who deem it ok to demean Christian symbols” do now that Mohammed has been found consorting with Pig Hookers in the same exhibit. If Enrique Chagoya and the Loveland Museum thought they had problems before wait till the Muslim hordes pick up on this.
 
This assumes the MSM will cover the Mohammed angle, so far they have primarily used the controversy to criticize those who have expressed outrage at the show’s Christian bashing content.  

Our always objective media are positively feasting on the fact that a woman trucker has taken a crowbar to the offending Jesus depiction, “The Misadventures of the Romantic Cannibals”, while conveniently ignoring the desecration of Mohammed. I wonder why? How is it that the MSM were happy to fan the flames of Muslim Faux Outrage over Terry Jones and his “burn a koran” stunt yet have remained silent over  Enrique Chagoya’s pornographic depiction of Mohammed? Could it be that the story would expose the hypocrisy of the MSM’s LibLeft narrative that hopes to exploit and condemn “right wing religious intolerance”? Could it be our MSM has neither the stomach nor the principles required to defend the “freedom of expression” of a left wing artiste charged with offending Islam?

Gee you don’t suppose the MSM is afraid of controversy do you? Or is the MSM just afraid of Muslims? G’wan!

This is bizarre, FOX, of all media, reported on the Christian aspect of the controversy without once mentioning Mohammed and the Hookers, even though the painting was prominently displayed in the newscast! Cheezus, can it be even Fox has caved to the Islamists?


H/T VanG

Share