How Globalism Marginalizes Religious Communities

I recently commented on the current emphasis on marginalization as a central moral issue, and said the tendency should not be idealized. Its basic effect, I suggested, is to support the movement toward an administratively integrated system covering the whole of social and economic life, and thus the interests of the bureaucrats and billionaires who would dominate such a system.

I might have added that the tendency won’t do anything to reduce marginalization, since every social order marginalizes. To say “this is how things should work” is to say “that isn’t how they should work, so let’s exclude it.” The division of labor adds a “who/whom” aspect to the process, since there are those who decide what’s what and those who have to swallow the decision. And the centralized nature and comprehensive reach of the system of social administration that is now thought the natural remedy for exclusion and other social ills pushes that tendency to extremes.

That’s why globalism and the nanny state lead to populist uprisings: everyone ends up marginalized except those at the very top.

  • simus1

    Almost everyone eventually winds up as a nonliving passive member of any random huge heap of murdered excess to requirements humans if they don’t show some initiative.

  • Seneca III

    It only marginalises non-Islamic ones.