Why feminists are so cagey about class

A new report produced by the University of Hull and the charity Plan UK has revealed the best and worst places for girls to grow up in the UK.

The research looked at average life expectancy, child-poverty rates, teenage-pregnancy rates, education and employment. It concluded that girls had a better quality of life in affluent areas like Surrey than in inner-city areas like Liverpool or Nottingham. ‘Overall, the UK is failing girls’, says Lucy Russell, one of the authors of the report. ‘Girls don’t have equal rights and equal life chances across the UK.’

Interestingly, the report did not include information on boys’ quality of life. The report claims it is ‘unapologetic in its focus on girls and their lives’. But it is still ignoring the elephant in the room. The fact that girls in Waverley enjoy higher quality of life than those in Salford has nothing to do with the fact that they’re girls and everything to do with the fact that, in comparison, Salford is a much poorer, working-class area.

  • xavier

    Further questions and do these poor working class neighbours have a high Moslem population percentage? If so what impact have the rape and slavery gangs had? And what impact do they still have on girls’ quality of life?

  • B__2

    The Socialist solution would be to confiscate or destroy enough property and assets in Surrey and house enough disgruntled lower socioeconomic class people in Surrey to bring it down to the standards of Liverpool and Nottingham. Thereby ensuring that all equally share in the same misery.

    • Clausewitz

      You’ve got that right. Socialism never raises the standard of living to the betterment of all, they just assault everyone to tear them down to the less common denominator.