Citizenship & Immigration Logo3

Leitch is sorta right about immigration

Apparently, wanting new Canadian immigrants to hold Canadian values is controversial.

According to a Globe and Mail editorial, the idea the federal government would even define Canadian values is “frightening.” Only in Canada.

The outrage continues over federal Conservative leadership candidate Kellie Leitch’s supposedly contentious point that we should screen would-be immigrants to weed out those who hold values that are anti-Canadian.

This is the most recent example of our politically correct culture gone mad.

Leitch is not entirely right, mass immigration does not benefit citizens, it does supply the means by which corporations suppress wages and ensures that the political class will have a new pool of voters to further balkanize and weaken the electorate.

None of Canada’s political parties are much different, they all want to operate the same immigration Ponzi scheme.

Do you feel well served by the political class and the immigration policy they foisted on our nation?

Do you trust the decision making prowess of the political class?

Whose idea was it to allow mass  immigration from Islamic states?

We’ve been repaid for our kindness with societal discord and a huge annual financial hit to contain their vibrant diversity.

Our security services are stretched so thin they openly admit they can’t track all the risks and have had to redirect scarce resources from other problem areas to focus on containing the threat posed by the religion of peace. How does this benefit Canada?

What was the motivation behind it all?

Was it deliberate malice as in the traitorous attempt by Labour in England to remake the population according to their toxic multicultural vision?

Or was it just the plain stupidity of virtue signalling naivete?

Do you feel well served being labelled a bigot or racist by your own government for daring to demand a halt to this madness?

We have yet time to mitigate the damage done,  the alternative is to follow down Europe’s suicidal path.

But then our political class so want to be sophisticated and European!

In France the army has drawn up plans to “reconquer” French territory. It doesn’t get more cosmopolitan than that.

Take your country back.

I’m going to recommend you read this article on the current US Race for the Presidency. There’s much that mirrors the desires of our own political class.

The Flight 93 Election

The sacredness of mass immigration is the mystic chord that unites America’s ruling and intellectual classes. Their reasons vary somewhat. The Left and the Democrats seek ringers to form a permanent electoral majority. They, or many of them, also believe the academic-intellectual lie that America’s inherently racist and evil nature can be expiated only through ever greater “diversity.” The junta of course craves cheaper and more docile labor. It also seeks to legitimize, and deflect unwanted attention from, its wealth and power by pretending that its open borders stance is a form of noblesse oblige. The Republicans and the “conservatives”? Both of course desperately want absolution from the charge of “racism.” For the latter, this at least makes some sense. No Washington General can take the court—much less cash his check—with that epithet dancing over his head like some Satanic Spirit. But for the former, this priestly grace comes at the direct expense of their worldly interests. Do they honestly believe that the right enterprise zone or charter school policy will arouse 50.01% of our newer voters to finally reveal their “natural conservatism” at the ballot box? It hasn’t happened anywhere yet and shows no signs that it ever will. But that doesn’t stop the Republican refrain: more, more, more! No matter how many elections they lose, how many districts tip forever blue, how rarely (if ever) their immigrant vote cracks 40%, the answer is always the same. Just like Angela Merkel after yet another rape, shooting, bombing, or machete attack. More, more, more!

  • andycanuck

    BTW, as Dean Skoreyko has been pointing out at his Twitter feed, Chretien’s Liberals were constantly talking about “Canadian values” (that also meant “Liberal Party values” of course) during their three governments with the Glib & Pale going along with that without a qualm.

  • Drunk_by_Noon

    “Leitch is not entirely right, mass immigration does not benefit citizens, it does supply the means by which corporations suppress wages and ensures that the political class will have a new pool of voters to further balkanize and weaken the electorate.”


    • And they use sacred tenet of “multiculturalism” as the bludgeon to quash dissent because questioning immigration automatically makes you a racist!

      • Drunk_by_Noon

        What a beautiful tautological feedback-loop they have constructed.

        • It’s worked well but can’t last much longer, people are wise to the con.

  • truepeers

    The media need to taste their nihilism. Canadian values? No criminal code for them, then. There just aren’t enough rough dudes smirking at them in the newsroom. The too pale girls are still getting hot and bothered by their bad boy proxies in the war against daddy.

    • I think that an accurate summation of CBC culture;)

  • Putting aside what the pansy Liberals think should be Canadian values, it stands to reason that if, at the very least, immigrants refuse to acclimatise and have no marketable skills, they should not be let in.

    Do Liberals truly believe that Islamists are fond of political multiculturalism and gender-fluidity?

  • mauser 98

    CBC catnip…they exist solely to call white people racist
    media will destroy her before next election…over for Leitch
    Cons spineless , homeless , rudderless

  • Alain

    To answer the question as to the reason when it comes to Canada, it was indeed deliberate malice by Trudeau Sr., and every federal government since has continued with population replacement that some call mass immigration.

  • Maggat

    Kellie Leitch, is spot on with her view on our immigration problem, however a better solution would be vetting and a greatly diminished immigration policy. Accept only those who APPLY to come to and can justify their admittance to Canada.

    Exactly as my wife and I had to do to bring her to Canada and eventually become a tax paying citizen.