Germany’s AfD Party Walks Out Of Meeting With Muslim 5th Columnists

A keenly-anticipated meeting between Germany’s Alternative for Germany and the head of the country’s main Muslim organization has ended in acrimony. The Muslim community leader said the AfD broke off the discussion.

AfD leader Frauke Petry walked out on meeting with Muslim 5th Columnists

AfD leader Frauke Petry walked out on meeting with Muslim 5th Columnists

  • Geller, Barnhardt, Le Pen, Petry – this is what feminism should be.

  • WalterBannon

    They should have told the muslims that they have until the end of summer to get out voluntarily or face expulsion by the state.

  • canminuteman

    What is there to discuss?

    • Yo Mama

      It may have been that part about converting to Islam or paying them all jizya not to be beheaded.

      • It’s always about the Jizya.

      • Gary

        I hope Obama pays attention to the lack of ” Workplace Violence ” in Japan during his tour there to apologize for the USA winning the WW2 and dropping the two bombs that save over 4,000,000 lives .
        Japan restricts muslim Immigrations and controls the number of mosques . Obama better not lecture Japan on Diversity to let in millions of muslims so they too can have suicide-bombers and beheading’s to co-workers plus the No-go Zone welfare ghettos .

        • Alain

          He can lecture the Japanese on “diversity” until the cows come home for what it is worth. The Japanese will likely smile and then ignore him and his BS once he departs. There is a reason for the lack of social disruption and unrest in Japan. This is also why when there are natural disasters you do not find people looting and taking advantage of empty houses and buildings. It is not due to fear of the police; it is called social cohesion. You may not like it, but it works.

          • Clinton

            States that hanker to become totalitarian don’t want social
            cohesion. Social disruption and unrest provide the excuses
            the “progressives” need to erode liberties, restrict freedom
            of speech, and penalize wrongthink. The population will
            be informed that increased government surveillance is
            for its own good. Raising sensible objections to the new
            vibrant diversity becomes a “hate crime”. And these
            wannabe totalitarians will absolutely wish to have their
            subjects disarmed and helpless. Sound familiar?

          • Alain

            Exactly! That is why they purposely continue importing en masse those they know will never assimilate and will only bring violence and destruction. It is not the work of ignorance by Western leaders we are facing; it is treason in my book.

    • What to discuss? Easy.

      Admit Islamic theology is full of hate, start an Islamic reformation, no foreign funding of mosques, no hate in mosques, no Islamic schools, no female Islamic headgear, no Islamic clothing, no multiple wives, no government handouts, all violent Muslims immediately jailed and sent to Muslim countries, any hate preachers immediately jailed, no Halal foods, no Islamic killing of animals.

      That’s a start.

      • canminuteman

        A start would be to say that European countries are the lands of the European peoples, that muslims and arabs are aliens who are not needed and not welcome, and can go back where they came from. Islam is incompatible with civilization and as such should not be tolerated in any form.

      • pdxnag

        Reform from far far away and let it season for a couple centuries first.

  • simus1

    Meeting with “official muslims” to promote honest dialogue is mostly a fool’s errand or a silly photo op time waster.

    • It is all that and worse.

    • Will Quest


  • Norman_In_New_York

    Petry’s bullshit detector went off the charts.

  • Gary

    ” Muslim community leader said the AFD broke off the discussion ”

    Translation : The Master-Race didn’t get the filthy infidels to bow to allah.

  • Brenda

    Klara Samkova, Sarah Palin…

  • Surele Surele

    What’s to discuss? You want to take over our country and we do not want to let you. Period. Now, just move out. Out of Europe. Build your caliphate elsewhere. Like in hell.

  • Ego

    Any so-called ‘interfaith dialog’ or ‘bridge-building’ with Muslims is a futile exercise.
    Islam gives three choices to the kafir: convert, submit and pay the jizya, or die. There is no other option.
    If a devout Muslim tells you otherwise, he is lying, as mandated (!) by the sharia:

    Reliance of the Traveler (a.k.a. sharia)
    Book r: Holding One’s Tongue
    r8.2 Permissible Lying
    If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N: i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory.

    Jihad is obligatory for all Muslims, as described elsewhere in the sharia.

  • pdxnag

    The only thing to discuss is the manner of the wholesale exit from the country.

  • dukestreet

    Some of the everyday people are getting the true picture in Europe. They join the groups that have a good sense of the fact that they are listening to lies and decide they won’t accept them.

    • Alain

      No doubt but having been reduced to powerlessness what can they do? They did not object when their government disarmed them, nor did they object when the same government eliminated their freedom and liberty piece by piece. Now any attempt to form a political party that recognises the danger and will put its own people first is prevented by hook or crook from getting elected. I would like to be more optimistic but cannot. We are also following the same road in Canada, just not yet as far along the same road.