The Colorado GOP Goes Full-On “Venezuela Level” Corrupt – And Then is Confidant Enough To ACTUALLY Tweet It

In 2015 the National Republican party (RNC) demanded a loyalty pledge from candidate Donald Trump.  Yesterday, the Republican Party of Colorado worked aggressively to insure that Donald Trump would not be allowed as the party candidate.

Then the Colorado GOP sent the following message:




It just gets worse from there.

HT: The Conservative Tree House

  • One more reason the GOP has to go.

    • Drunk_by_Noon

      If Trump succeeds, he needs to disassemble the whole rotten apparatus from top to bottom, with JAIL time for the manipulators that were breaking the law.
      They and the Dems have a gentelman’s agreement not to look too hard at each other’s corruption.
      That uniparty cabal needs to be broken up.
      That’s the only way.

      • Norman_In_New_York

        New York City’s U.S. Attorney has been sending crooked pols of both parties to Federal prisons for the last seven years. His latest target is Mayor DiBlasio.

    • Clausewitz

      I think you mean GOPe.

    • unalien

      Con Treehouse is a pro Trump propaganda blog run by a troll,,

      The ballot errors came from Trump supporters,,

      “On Saturday, Trump backers passed out flyers at the convention site with official campaign slate of 13 delegates and 13 alternates accompanied by their three-digit number position on the 600-plus person ballot. Seven of the names, however, directed people to the wrong number and one delegate’s name was misspelled. Other candidates did not have errors on their slates.

      In one case, an erroneous number corresponded with a Cruz supporter. A second flyer handed out by the Trump campaign contained four mismatched names and numbers.”

  • Clink9

    What a banana republic.

    • Drunk_by_Noon

      Normally I’d take offense at such a comment.

  • mauser 98

    Bernie wins Wyoming and is robbed blind

    “Clinton, meanwhile, also gets the state’s four superdelegates — who
    already pledged their allegiance to her in January. So despite “losing,”
    she triumphs 11-7 in the delegate tally.”

  • Hard Little Machine

    When they hand the country over to Madame Batshit it will be vaguely funny I suppose.

  • ontario john

    And speaking of bat shit crazy political parties. I see the NDP have just dumped Mulcair as leader. They have also gone full commie with the adoption of the Leap Manifesto. Perhaps they will elect Naomi Klein as the new leader.

    • David Smith

      Well we do need something to laugh about in these darkening days.

  • BeukendaalMason

    Wait… so its not ok for people to not like Trump? Is it now mandatory to have to support him? Who made that rule? Trump? Not everyone who dislikes Trump is part of a “vast right wing conspiracy”, some might dislike his viewpoints like Government controlled Healthcare and Education (Trumps #2 and #3 jobs for the Federal Government), or slander of those who might disagree with him or “get in his way”. When did Colorado Republicans for Liberty become the GOP? Because it might discredit the Colorado Republicans? If the GOP is bad, then why is ok for Trump to hire a bunch of them for his campaign? When is a group of people bad, and people from the same group good?

  • Minicapt

    … self-inflicted injuries are not the fault of others.


  • barryjr

    The Republican party doesn’t need super delegates they have the GOPe.

  • unalien

    never ever go full retard, and never post anything from the con treehouse,, it is a blog run by a racist pro Trump troll.. if you dig enough you can find his identity..

    • Clausewitz

      Well you made the claim, cite the source.

      • unalien

        you can find out the name and rep in about 2 minutes but you chose not to,, hint, dude lives in Florida and uses several aliases,, and he is a well known flake among American conservative bloggers.

        • Drunk_by_Noon

          Says the man with 137 comments and a hidden profile.

    • Drunk_by_Noon

      A RACIST!!!!!

      If that’s all ya got, then ya ain’t got much,

      • unalien

        what is this kindergarten, do your own due diligence pinhead or do you prefer to remain like an ignorant “liberal” sheep and believe everything presented to you. Use your own brain dude..

        • Drunk_by_Noon

          My “brain” tells me that if you had ANY evidence, you would have presented it.
          That’s how rational empiricism works, baby!

          You just hate Trump, and you hate that website, maybe even for independent reasons. I don’t know. I don’t care.

          In any event, if you don’t have any evidence to back up your claim, that means that I am unlikely to find any either, no matter how much of my time I waste attempting to validate YOUR pet theory, which, by the way, is your job and not mine.
          So really, I just logically connected all of the dots that PROVES that I’m actually smarter and better informed than you are.
          See how I did that?

          Cough up the proof, which I’m convinced you do not have, or screw off.
          Your credibility here is ZERO.

          • unalien

            Your “brain” also tells you that a pro Trump troll running a blog from a basement in Florida is a credible source of information.

            I have more cred than you’ll ever know..

            You have never checked the source, never challenged the information because it confirms your pro Trump bias, that is what Liberals do..

            This piece posted by BC from Con Tree is bogus, Trumps own team made the errors. Using Con Treehouse as a source of reliable and objective information is a sign of mental instability.. it is propaganda and disinformation,,

            If you can’t tell me right now who is behind that blog, then you are the sucker…

          • Drunk_by_Noon

            After you master basic punctuation, I then suggest that you study how to wield an ad hominem attack correctly, so as to not look like an imbecile.
            You argument will not be any more truthful, but you will at least sound like less of an unhinged nut.

            Please explain to all of us what the difference is between an advocate and a troll, other than one is contrary to your own emotions.

            Next, please address what honorable and ethical intentions were behind the tweet “we did it” that did seem to belay to all sentient beings a premeditated outcome?

          • unalien

            So, can we assume you have no idea who is behind the blog from which you derive your “reality”.