Why are feminists refusing to discuss the Cologne sex attacks?

Regardless of the background of the men who carried out the attacks in Cologne on New Year’s Eve, it is a pretty horrific story. A series of sexual attacks took place in the city centre by a group of around 1,000 men. More than 150 women have filed criminal complaints, three-quarters of them for sexual assault. Two cases of rape have been reported. It is the kind of story that should make headlines – and should provide ample fodder for writers who like to tackle feminist topics head on. After all, surely this is the very definition of ‘rape culture’? And if the actual attacks aren’t enough to merit a reaction, then how about the suggestion by Cologne’s female mayor that women should adopt a ‘code of conduct‘ to prevent future assault. Is that not the very definition of ‘victim blaming’?

  • Editor

    Because the 3rd wave feminist narrative is based on lies and discussing these events would force them to question their oppression stack. You know, this whole priviledge+power idiocy.

    • AmicusC

      also they don’t actually care about women

      • simus1

        An alpha leftist elitist really regards how “injustice cobblestones” and other sundry items can be chosen and made to fit together to build a solid road to his goal of totalitarian power. Who are temporarily helped and who are permanently destroyed in the process to reach the desired destination is close to irrelevant.

  • kkruger71

    The code of conduct thing is far stronger than the minor comments made that inspired the whole “slut walk” movement. Can’t decide whether the muted reaction is because the perpetrators were minorities or that the proclamation came from a left-leaning female. Funny it’s taking this long for a feminist to come up with a reasonably effective spin on this, but rest assured as soon as one comes up with it the rest will repeat it loudly and often, like it is self-apparent common knowledge.

  • Gary

    The only reason that GLAAD gave Hillary a pass for Chris Stevens brutal death by muslim homophobes in Benghazi was because she suddenly supported same-gender marriage . Imam Obama joined in too which is why GLAAD stays quiet about ISIS tossing gays from roof tops.
    King Obama keeps telling us that islam is a Religion Of Peace , so to keep up the charade GLAAD can NOT link the quranic homophobia to islam.

    No wonder gays did so well in the gestapo from the way they can turn on their own so quickly and see them tossed into the Ovens with the others.
    I still thin that Smithermen drove his husband out of the house from abuse while the Police made a big mistake to drag him back to Furious George because shortly after he was back in the abusive home he killed him self .

    No wife of a male partner would be forced back to an abusive home. My guess is that the Police feared Barbara Hall and being called homophobes if they hinted at domestic abuse for a gay couple.
    Did anyone else notice how fast George recovered and then went Public to promote Olivia Chow as the new Mayor. Didn’t take him long to get over it.

  • roccolore

    That’s because feminists defend radical Islam.

  • Hard Little Machine

    Why? Because feminists use their rhetoric as simply another attack on the west. It has nothing to do with women or rights or privilege or anything it has to do with tearing down the west. This tears down the west so they’re in favor of it.

    • Alain

      Yes, anything to advance their marxist agenda so it has really nothing to do with the welfare of women other than themselves.

  • Clink9

    The lefty narrative is unravelling like a cheap suit.

  • FactsWillOut

    They are leftists before they are feminists.

  • Jabberwokk

    As has been said it is because cultural Marxism was designed to destroy western society not Islamic society.