• Editor

    Hey, if the person or persons filming self identify as whatever made up special snowflake social construct gender you need to be to use these bathrooms, aren’t these two women voyeur shaming?

  • LauraS

    Gee, who didn’t see this coming? Just the university educated academics at U of T, it seems. Potential students and donors take note.

  • Oh my God!

    • Justin St.Denis

      I feel absolutely certain that God had nothing to do with this trainwreck of circumstances, ideology and perversion.

  • The Butterfly

    I believe that if you even intimated that this might happen you were branded a filthy, irredeemable racist who needed to be fired from their job whatever that was.

  • moraywatson

    ‘“The purpose of this temporary measure is to provide a safe space for the women who have been directly impacted by the incidents of voyeurism and other students who may feel more comfortable in a single-gender washroom,” said Scott.’
    “Temporary”? Until what? LOL! Until its permanent, like the way common sense used to dictate?

  • David Murrell

    If the number of gender-neutral bathrooms are reduced, won’t the designated, oppressed minority file a complaint to the Ontario Human Rights Commission. The minority filing the complaint, in this case is the perp taking the pictures though the shower curtain.

  • Xavier

    Is anyone campaigning on “A Privy For Every Child” yet?

  • Blacksmith

    This just goes to show that all those that go to college are not necessarily the smartest people, unless they had no choice (there were no bathrooms gender specific) they were just asking to be abused by voyeurs. Hopefully they have learned a life lesson here.