Britain must prioritise Christian refugees who have been crucified, beheaded, raped, & subjected to forced conversion by ISIS says former Archbishop of Canterbury

Britain should “crush” Isil by taking part in military action in Syria, a former Archbishop of Canterbury suggests today amid mounting calls for further air strikes.

In an article for The Telegraph, Lord Carey says that it is “not enough” to send aid to Syria and admit thousands of refugees to this country.

He argues that Isil needs to be dealt with “for once and for all” and that “air strikes and other British military assistance” may be needed in Syria.

He also says Britain should be prioritising Christian refugees who are victims of “ethnic cleansing” and have been crucified, beheaded, raped, and subjected to forced conversion by Isil.

  • canminuteman

    I’m not sure how you protect a refugee who has ben crucified, but if Britain wants to take Christian refugees they need to ethnically cleanse the country to make room for them, or there really I no point.

  • ntt1

    good start, it is vital to recognize the enemy ,so many of whom have already been allowed into Britain, prioritizing christians and yazidi may enflame the marxists but then it is just alinsky derived kabuki theatre with no force of consciousness behind it . Good for Bishop Carey he was the last sane Archbishop in the recent past.

    • Bregh

      Agree entirely on all points, and was going to make that very same comment vis. Lord Carey.

  • mauser 98

    Obama has brought in tens of thousands of Muslim immigrants to US

  • Millie_Woods

    I support nothing short of total war. Full scale invasion complete with no-fly, naval blockade, tactical nuclear weapons if necessary, military justice, summary execution of agitators and anybody caught with arms in occupied territory. And above all No Media. Anything else is just more of the same shit we’ve put up with since Vietnam. Who wants to send their kids into another war ran by leftist pricks?

    • Sounds a little extreme.

      But war is extreme. And I buy it.

      So, liberals, get over it.

      • Millie_Woods

        I consider out and out nuking to be extreme. What I’m supporting is fighting a war like you want to win. As Patton said “when you’ve got them by the balls, their hearts and minds will follow”.

        • WalterBannon

          nuking is the only way to be sure….

    • WalterBannon

      I support a total scorched earth war, nuclear biological and chemical.

      No it is not extreme, it is a reasonable response as long as they continue to invade us with their emigration jihad.

  • Dana Garcia

    Meanwhile el stupido Pope suggests Europe’s churches take in refugees.

    Actually churches have been turned into flophouses for foreign moochers for years.

    • DMB

      This is exactly why Christianity is dying in Europe. The Pope is so far out of touch with the congregation in favor of people who are not only not part of it but want to destroy it.

      • BillyHW

        He’s a faggot who’s in touch with his rectum. Daily.

    • BillyHW

      Pope Rancid Dick has got to go. Where’s a crazed Turkish psycho hanging around the popemobile when you need one?

      • dance…dancetotheradio

        Pope Rancid Dick.
        Well, you know, if you don’t use it you lose it.
        Maybe we could get one of the members of Duran Duran to take him out.

  • DMB
  • Gary

    The christians will just end up being slaughtered by the muslims in the UK.

    • BillyHW

      British women will marry their rapists willingly and convert to Islam.

  • BillyHW

    It will never happen because Christian refugees don’t rape and women voters love to be raped. British political parties know on what side their bread is buttered.

  • WalterBannon

    Britain should prioritize the expulsion of all muslims and the execution of their treasonous politicians who let them in in the first place.

  • How many of them wound up dead on Turkish beaches?