Vice Publishes Pro-Bestiality Article on Their New Feminist Blog Broadly

Broadly Animal Urges Tweet

Earlier this year, the well-known ultra-hipster magazine and clickbait cesspool Vice launched a new site called Broadly, which is essentially their answer to feminist blogs like Jezebel and Feministing. When the blog was first announced, its publisher Shannon Kelley stated: “If you look at the current landscape of women’s media, it is purely reactionary. Blogs are either reacting to the news, gossiping about celebrities or discussing the latest beauty and fashion trends. No one is telling original stories that women specifically relate to. For Vice, it is in our DNA to provide original, story-driven video content and speak to a millennial audience.”

So, what kind of original, non-reactionary, millennial-approved content that women specifically relate to is Vice publishing under its new Broadly umbrella?


Pictured: A very small sample of the kind of content published by Broadly. Empowering, thought-provoking stuff, to be sure.

Well, aside from the usual insipid junk about fashion, celebrities, dating, horoscopes, “the patriarchy”, and so forth, Broadly just published this new article about how bestiality is the latest progressive thing that modern-day women should embrace.

No, I’m not exaggerating.

The article is called “Animal Urges: Women and Bestiality“. It opens with this picture, setting the mood:


Yeah, you see where this is going. But let’s go further.

Why would anyone want to have sex with anything other than a human being? I scoured the internet for female bestiality performers and found lessons on desire and deviance instead.

If you’re taking “lessons” from people who have sex with animals, it might be time to rethink your life.

The author states that, before conducting her “research”, she agreed with sensible people that bestiality is wrong:

We all know the main argument for why inter-special mating between animals and humans is wrong: common language. “Animals cannot talk, thus cannot accuse the individual of forcing them to have sex with him/her against their will,” wrote Ramsis in his 1969 study, which is cited by sexual therapist and author Dr. Hani Miletski in her book Understanding Bestiality and Zoophila.) Furthermore, animals carry different diseases, genes, hormones; it’s just too obscure. Most people think it’s biologically gross and morally wrong.

This is where I stood when I started this research. Why would anyone want to have sex with anything other than a human being? But, as I logged into every bestiality forum that would accept me, read all the comment threads, uncovered all the theories from therapists, doctors, and sexologists, and talked to some female zoophiles themselves, my thoughts changed. I’m not for it, but their arguments started to seem…if not valid, at least understandable. Did my nights on Beast Forum create a type of Stockholm Syndrome? I mean, what’s so wrong about desiring a reindeer? I found myself thinking, horrified. How is having sex with a pig any crueler than murdering it for bacon? What’s worse, rape or murder? My logical self vacated for the sake of an argument.

Now, I’ve been a vegetarian since I was ten years old, but even I can tell you that killing a pig for bacon at least serves some kind of purpose, whereas raping a pig does not. This is not exactly a very complex concept. People in third-world countries depend on meat for living, but nobody depends on raping animals for anything other than their own sick desires.

The author goes on to describe at great length how bestiality has been practiced all throughout human history, as if that makes it okay. I mean, last I checked, murder has been practiced throughout all of human history too. So have rape, pedophilia, slavery, genocide, and – perhaps worst of all – “patriarchy”. Does that mean that those things are okay too?

The article then goes on to talk about the long history of porn actresses having sex with animals. You mean, porn actresses tend to be mentally damaged individuals? Shock and awe! I don’t know about you, but I don’t really consider the behavior of porn stars to be a model for what ordinary women should do.

The article then goes on to the author describing how hard it was for her to find female zoophiles who were willing to talk to her.

When I started this research my goal was simple: to talk to a woman who has had sex with an animal for either pay or pleasure. Male zoophiles dominated Miletski’s statistics (she had 80 male participants and 11 female), and I wasn’t interested in interviewing yet another pale German man about all the “beautiful, reciprocal” lovemaking he shares with his mutt.

In other words, men who have sex with animals are disgusting perverts (which, to be fair, they are), but women who have sex with animals are just misunderstood.

Defeated and without a subject, I turned my focus to those who fucked animals for pleasure, not pay, and dove deep into Beast Forum, the biggest international zoophilia chatroom going. The interface was outdated, like an Angelfire site from the early 2000s, but thousands of people are active daily. When I originally signed up for a profile, I forgot to change my gender to female and was shot down by almost any woman I approached in a chat room. I was honest about why I was there and batted down constantly. “I have no interest in talking to you for your work,” one lady retorted. This was the only place I was going to find an experienced zoo, so I filled out my profile page accurately as though I was on OkCupid and hit the chatrooms the next night. I offered my thoughts in public threads and spent hours integrating myself into the site. Suddenly, a few females were willing to open up with me. I quickly discovered women were mostly about having a relationship to animals rather than having sex with them, as Miletski would attest.

Last I checked, all pet owners had some kind of “relationship” with their pets. The key thing here is that, for people who aren’t mentally ill degenerates, it isn’t a sexual relationship.

The article then talks about how raping animals isn’t sexual deviancy, but pure love, you nasty bigots. At least, it is when women do it, anyways.

“I’m generalizing here, but in my clinical studies women are less interested in sexually deviant behavior,” Miletski had told me over the phone weeks before my foray onto Beast Forum. “The women that were in my [bestiality] study actually cherished the relationship to their animal partner. That was a big part of the whole appeal to these women, and all their partners were male dogs.”

It then discusses how the poor zoophiles (which is a LEGITIMATE SEXUAL ORIENTATION, bigots!) are stigmatized, ostracized, and marginalized by the cisheteropatriarchy, and how dogs are better than men anyways.

I logged into Beast Forum at night, when most of the action happened, and I trolled discussion groups: “Does Your Partner Know You Are Into Bestiality?”, “A Wife’s Priority: To All The Married Ladies Out There,” “Hey Housewives,” and pages and pages of forums on the stigma facing zoophiles who keep their sexual orientation secret from the “normals” in their lives. For some, it is just that: a sexual orientation. They argue they could not change even if they wanted to (and most do not.) For a lot of women in the discussion groups, their zoophilia started with some kind of fucked-up rejection from humans. One girl confessed that when her older boyfriend humiliated her after his wife caught her blowing him, she wished men were more like her loving dog, and then just ended up making the dog her boyfriend. Others wrote about life after divorce and finding calm, comfort, and great sex in their animal lovers.

Did we mention that dogs are better than men?

“I’ve never fallen in love with an animal that didn’t return the love,” one woman wrote. Most people on the message boards and in Miletski’s study said the same thing. People can reject you, tell you to fuck off; an animal can’t disappoint you the way a human being can. Your relationship to a dog can’t deteriorate over money problems or jealousy or sexual disinterest. It can’t fall “out of love” because it never was in what we define as love in the first place. A sexual relationship with an animal is basic, simple, and never emotionally exhausting. On the flipside, you cannot keep a person hostage under your domestic rule the way you can an animal. Although no zoophile on Beast Forum confessed to seeing her relationship as having a power dynamic, there is no way it wouldn’t be.

After lots and lots of graphic descriptions of how these women have sex with animals, the article concludes with the following:

During her peek of acceptance and popularity, Joensen did a bestiality advice column in SCREW magazine, helping other curious zoo females intimate sex with animals safely. In one entry, a reader asked her what the point was in sucking off a pig, since the semen “is so thick and clots so fast and it can stick in your throat and choke you to death.”

Joensen responded with a beauty tip in broken English. “But don’t you know the semen is making a beautiful cold cream compress for the shinningness [sic] and smoothness of the face skin? No pimples any more I am having since this wonderful discovery.”

Well, there you have it, modern women. There’s your non-reactionary feminism. I sure hope you swallow it (ugh) and enjoy it, because this is the cutting-edge of progressive feminist journalism. And, rest assured, folks: if you think that women having sex with animals is wrong, then WOW. LIKE, JUST WOW. I LITERALLY CAN’T EVEN. IT’S 2015 YOU FUCKING BIGOTS JUST WOW. I LITERALLY CAN’T BELIEVE PEOPLE LIKE YOU STILL EXIST. I HOPE YOU CHOKE TO DEATH ON PIG SEMEN YOU ZOOPHOBIC SHITLORDS.

One can only imagine what kind of bold, progressive, and thought-provoking content Vice‘s new feminist blog will give us in the near future.  Perhaps an article about women who enjoy having sex with their own newborn babies?  Hell, I honestly wouldn’t be surprised at this point.

Finally, I just thought I should mention that these other articles were published very recently too:

Pedophilia: A Disorder, Not a Crime” in The New York Times

Is Incest Wrong?” in Big Think

Is Necrophilia Wrong?” in Big Think

‘Genetic sexual attraction is normal, and very real’: A woman describes the reality of parent-child incest in Salon

It’s time to reconsider how we treat pedophiles” in The Daily Dot

5 Ways We Misunderstand Pedophilia (That Makes it Worse)” in Cracked

That thing that you’re feeling is the feeling of progress and enlightenment, folks. You’d better embrace it… that is, unless you want to be a hateful bigot on the wrong side of history.

  • Boy, you can’t beat that for clickbait.

    • Al_the_Fish

      I bet the article was paid for by Big Peanut Butter.

      • Jason Bourne


  • Brenda

    The real point of interest here is the author, Tracie Egan Morrissey. She used to write for Jezebel, where among other things, she once got a pornographer to look at her vagina and say which category it fell into (He’d divided vaginas into 4 categories, but I can’t remember what they were.) It would take me too long to look up that particular link, but if you have time to waste you can probably find it here somewhere.

    And incidentally, isn’t Vice a competitor of the big Gawker empire of Nick Denton? I guess Egan Morrissey jumped ship at the right time.

    • Petey

      I know it’s all very outrageous, but we all know that’s really the point. To a degree. But it’s really, “Are these sites generating profit?” I’m assuming they are.
      Despite their content I’m impressed with their business sense in understanding this internet age.

    • It’s all part of the game.

      • Justin St.Denis

        There are plenty of pesos in peddling perversion.

  • Blind Druid

    With the advent of HD internet porn, along with the MGTOW movement and the rise of the Feminazi Superbitch, plus the raw deal men get from the justice system when marriages fail, it’s becoming increasingly obvious (check out Japan) that men want less and less to do with crazy women. Once the Fembot has been perfected (the Japs are almost there), women will no choice but to fuck animals. Forgive my droll sense of humour.

    • BlueBoomPony

      When the sexbots reach the level of the ones in the movie A.I. then I will consider them “there.”

    • John Smith

      What makes you think they won’t make robots for women too? They will get them first! They will have to include a fat full wallet to really interest a woman though.

      • MGTOW dum moriar

        That’s fine with me. A lot of women will push to have sexbots banned, which will be much more difficult if women are using them too. I think the next big marriage battle will be for the legalization of polygamy. Most men don’t make enough money to make modern women happy anyway and their apparent ability to turn lesbian on a whim won’t do them any good since there won’t be a man for the judge to fuck out of everything he owns.

        • But which (kind of) man would want to share a women. She can only get pregnant from one.

        • piccolit

          plenty of vibrators around but they still want to ban porn and sexbots for you. what women want is absolute control over you, because you are the tool they want to exploit and sex was the way women could legittimaly exploit men

      • Nothing. Abyss Creations makes sex dolls for women already. Better then feminists fuck animals or little boys.

    • another word for men who hate women is “gay”

    • Abyss Creations want to start shipping sexbots next year. YES!

  • Linda1000

    The last thing I watched on Vice was a documentary on donkey sex in Columbia. It’s apparently a widely accepted cultural practice in villages and towns. More proof that all cultures are not equal but I was surprised it was South America.

    • WalterBannon

      You got that wrong, it was donkey sex in the DISTRICT of Columbia, not South America….

      • Frank

        I’m not sure if you’re making a joke or not, but it was in the country of Columbia.

        • U.R.n.Idiot

          That’s like saying that the rednecks and hillbillies fucking their cousins, proves that incest is a widely accepted cultural practice in the U.S.

          • Frank

            What the fuck are you talking about? The Vice documentary was about donkey fucking in the country of Columbia.

      • Linda1000

        Okay, but Cartagena, Columbia, northern coast looks like part of South America to me.

    • Columbia is a US state, Colombia is a country in South America. I’m from Colombia and never heard of donkey sex here

      • Linda1000

        Sorry, my mistake as I thought it was Columbia, S. America but it was the District of Columbia in the U.S.? See the other comment above on my wrong geography. That’s why I said it surprised me it would be a S. American country as generally, S.A. countries are quite religious (Catholics?) I think.

  • It has been obvious from the first that the “sexual revolution” so-called aims at a generalized orgy where everyone and everything has sex with everyone and everything. They want to go all out, to allow their sick desires to explode ad infinitum.

    Little do they realize to absolute horror they are individually heading for so willfully. The day they do, their hearts will melt with unbridled panic and they will experience the full potential of pain in this body and mind of theirs. Poor fools.

    • Jabberwokk

      I’m not so sure that a mind so depraved is capable of grasping a moment of truth. There exists darkness so black that all things are consumed by it, black holes for example.

      • WalterBannon

        They are protected from having an epiphany by the vacuum inside their skull.

      • Justin St.Denis

        Is that an oblique reference to ” nappy-headed hoes”?

        • Jabberwokk

          If it is it’s accidental.

    • BillyHW

      You sir, must be a racist.

    • MGTOW dum moriar

      Most women will never feel guilty for what they’ve done. A lot of the are feeling terrified that the free ride will be over soon, though. And that’s about as close to remorse as most will ever get. I’m not shocked or even surprised at the depths of depravity of modern women.

    • Only for women. Men should be all castrated.

  • Clink9

    Obama voters, dog f*******

  • Hard Little Machine

    Hillary/Poochie ’16

    • BlueBoomPony

      I’m going with Trump/GrumpyCat

  • k1992

    God is dead, Nietzsche assured us however long ago. Is it surprising that this sort of thing is occurring when many people no longer believe in an objective meaning to morality? What’s perhaps surprising is that our societies haven’t degenerated faster than they in fact have – we’re still living on the residual collateral of our faded Christian-Judaic ethical systems. But this is finally dying out, it seems.

    • Benjamin ODonnell

      Always love that one fag that blames it on the absence of religion. Religion has nothing to do with the destruction of our society you can attempt your arguments but we were shitty back then too hell we even used religion as an excuse to be fucked up. Tell me how burning some bitches is ok because they could use herbs? or torturing those who don’t submit? What a fucking joke the lack of societal values and morals are on ourselves and ourselves alone fucking jackasses like you make me fucking sick you’re no different then liberal fucks blaming others for their own actions

      • kki

        Your comment is terrifyingly bad and I will explain why. First of as we are discussing religion I should note I’m not a religious person myself, so that you will not blame me on groundless basis.

        To start, the person you replied to never stated to be religious nor praised religion, in fact very much the opposite. Of course you did not pick this up, as your views of religion are absolutely childish. What was mentioned was “ethical system”: explaining in detail to a person that has clearly no idea what this does mean is difficult, but let’s put it this way- the ethical viewpoint of religion is not to “burn some bitches” but humanitarian values instead. You might for example notice that code of laws are very heavily influenced by religion and its ethical grounds, one could argue that particular reason for religion to exist is to enforce societal norms like this. This is the point where your comment goes horribly wrong: you confuse ethical standing of religion to be applicable to real life and historical examples.

        If you’d read the comment closely before making your horrible response you’d see both of you are sort of criticizing religion. k1992 implies clearly in his comment that moral basis of religion should be viewed as humanitarian guideline, as real life deviates of this and does not follow this examples. This leads to the abuse of religion and other fanatical occurrences, including violence and persecutions. In light of this, it is absolutely easy to see that in fact, both of you are criticizing religion and its forms. But instead of realizing this you type out a horrendous response forcing your own point trough without really ever understanding what the other person is saying, resorting to witch-hunts and other totally irrelevant examples in your out-of-place anti-religion rant.

        “fucking jackasses like you make me fucking sick”. You see, I’m an atheist, but it’s people like you that make me fucking sick. You use any change you get to start anti-religion flame-baits without even ever realizing what you are actually discussing. People with the amount of brain as you really give anyone criticizing religion bad name, and you’re no better from those religious minorities that force their world-views on others in an aggressive and factually wrong outbursts.

        I hope you read the entire comment, lengthy as it is, and saw that I’m not criticizing you basing my arguments on personal insults or off-topic discussion, nor am I trying to say you are beyond saving: I merely want you to learn from your mistakes before embarrassing yourself any further, and I sincerely believe with an effort and self-analysis you can become a better commenter in future.

        • Petter

          Laws aren’t so much based on religion as laws and religion are both based on … human nature.

          • kki

            It was an example, but I agree with you. I just decided to point this out as some undeniable similarities exist, but the matter is of course more complicated.

        • Benjamin ODonnell

          As I took a second read I do realize I misinterpreted what he said but still in the end every religion has wrote the be good and do this and dont do that crap not that it ever helped because half of it was always messed up. Religion is fine to an extent however it does not belong near any laws again morality and ethical/societal values does not need a religion it only needs logic and scientific outlook like don’t bone your siblings besides being disgusting and pretty sad it also causes genetic defects and problems if you wanna bone animals you probably have a brain dysfunction ect ect.

          Still I blame My misunderstanding on my lack of sleep and usual breed of people I meet who are either really stupid left wing nutters or super right wing who try and shove god down your throat I hate both oh and hippys but thats another matter. I did read what you said and while a lot of it is sensical and has a point I obviously do disagree with part of it. We as humans were creating ways to communicate and exist together long before we went and created a deity personally as I believe when we went god crazy is when we started the motion for our ethical/moral collapse of our society in our ancestors attempt to force these strict over bearing and dreadfully retarded “guidelines” as you put it sowed the seed for these type of people to show up

  • Mark van der Wal

    I remember a course I took in school years ago where the topic of bestiality came up one respondent brought up the topic of consent ,the question being is one bark to be seen as a consent or how would consent be noted

  • rechill

    They’re worried about how the sex affects the animal yet what is it doing to one’s psyche (not to mention spirit) to degrade oneself like that.

  • Eggard Snark


  • Flo

    What an empowered Feminist woman.

  • Sarah McWilliams

    So feminists support having sex with animals now, including pet dogs?? Why am I NOT surprised. What a bunch of psychotic perverts.

  • Stephen Thompson

    To be fair, the Cracked article in no way condones pedophilia.

    • BlueBoomPony

      Had the same thought. We can recognize certain things as disorders without decriminalizing the actions that may stem from them. Aren’t a lot of career criminal sociopaths? Understanding that doesn’t condone it.

      And not all sociopaths become street thugs. The rest go into politics.


      Thank you!

    • you’re not being fair, you’re being more tolerant of disgusting behavior

  • JudgeDeadd

    What? You mean people are now trying to pass off zoophilia and pedophilia as normal?

    Why, this is something absolutely nobody saw coming, ever!

    • Remember: Only when women do it it’s something special and wonderful.

      If men do the same it is evil and disgusting and need to be punished as harshly as possible.

  • Muffie

    Worst of all “Patriarchy”? You full serious or what? I mean, surely its worse than rape, pedophilia, slavery and genocide? I don’t even get it, you’re obviously out of your mind to some extent to think that the patriarchy could be worse than any of those things.

    Would you prefer to have men in positions of power, or for an entire race to be wiped off the earth? Or perhaps women can be in power, but rape is ok?

    Seriously, this whole patriarchy nonsense is just that, nonsense. Women rights are the best they have ever been yet feminism is becoming more and more aggressive and oppressive. This whole SJW and check your privilege crap is getting out of hand, there’s no reason to further encourage this rubbish.

  • Blightness

    Where do these wackos come from? Jesus Christ.

  • Petter

    Femitheism is LITERALLY about attributing unexceptionally attributing evil to males but not to females. Female behavior simply can’t be immoral — unless, perhaps, if it affects another female in a negative way.

    Me, I will refrain from saying what I think the article writer deserves.

  • MegaMan10100

    Animals already have interspecies sex with eachother. Just google interspecies sex, it’s easy to find examples.
    And since animals do this by themselves and with many diffrent species, then why is it wrong with interspecies sex when it involves humans?
    In my opinion should bestiality be legal.
    Also about the current laws. The law was built on the lie (in my eyes it’s a lie) that animals can’t consent. But I know that animals can consent to sex with a human.
    Animals can comunicate through thier body language. Animals already use thier body language when they want food, walking or to take a bath. We understand animals feelings then, so why is it suddenly mission impossible when it’s about sex?
    Last but not least animals are sexualy grown and can make thier own sexual decisions.
    Thanks for reading!

    • you’re nasty. you’re not a real man, you are a worthless monkey

  • Dogglovur

    Well, if the faggots are now socially acceptable, why can’t I love my fur baby?

    • that’s what i sometimes think of when i see dog freaks calling themselves “dog lovers”. I always wonder that they aren’t into bestiality

    • Ferdinandus Torris

      homosexuality has nothing to do with bestiality! one thing is loving another human and another thing is being a pervert with your pet >:(

  • pacman7293

    If this isn’t girl power I dunno what is!

  • PerturbedWonderer

    This isn’t the first time, I believe there was a pro child molestation leftist movement during the sixties… and then go backwards to the late 20’s Berlin. I wouldn’t be worried but this kind of shit is the breeding ground for Right Wing fascism after people get tired of this… Know a little history and you’ll find quite the few parallels, none with a happy ending :/

  • Carlaveramillan
    Bestiality movies Legal
    Zoofilia Movies Legal.
    Private bestiality 2015
    Not Artofzoo,Zaina,K9dolls,K9lady,

  • That is so disgusting, what is wrong with people? Had no idea this was so common.

  • Ferdinandus Torris

    It’s not only disgusting but also very sad that they really believe that the love of an animal is better than a human, “because they are not jealous, they are not mean, etc” True love doesn’t mean that your partner has to be perfect and obey you as a pet, that’s egocentric and perverse…

    • NwoDispatcher .


      I wonder if the pet is actually taking place of a child for a childless woman. The unconditional love that they have is a consequence of their helpless posture. Damaged bubble-addicted people.

  • luz

    This kind of make want to not being alive in this planet.

  • Troy_Davis

    I can’t say I’m surprised considering some of the guys that women go for now that already look like animals. White pigs and black apes due to them trying to emulate what ever they see on reality TV or a a Disney movie, so this isn’t really a far stretch for them. But with articles like this telling how great it is, no wonder a lot of these young guys are giving up on women. I can’t WAIT for all the “animal rape” cases in the future.

  • Marizza Pia Andrade

    ” For a lot of women in the discussion groups, their zoophilia started with some kind of fucked-up rejection from humans. One girl confessed that when her older boyfriend humiliated her after his wife caught her blowing him, she wished men were more like her loving dog, and then just ended up making the dog her boyfriend. ”

    So, she was sucking off a married man, got caught, humans are garbage, goes to fuck a dog

    Ye “society made me this way”