Obama Vows ‘Ironclad’ Support Of Israel If Israel Destroyed By Iran – satire

Israeli officials had no direct comment on the matter, as none were invited to the meeting

Washington, April 21 – President Barack Obama sought to reassure Israel and its allies in the US that an impending deal with Iran over the latter’s nuclear ambitions would not compromise his commitment to backing the Jewish State if it is completely obliterated by Iran’s atomic weapons.

The president met with Jewish leaders at the White House today, and told them his administration does not intend to withdraw even an ounce of support for Israel in the event of a ballistic missile attack that wipes the country off the map, a goal Iran’s leadership has publicly declared. Jews and israelis need not worry, said Obama, for if Iran follows through on its goal of destroying Israel, the US would maintain its commitment to vetoing UN Security Council resolutions that single out the Jewish State for condemnation. He also promised that existing trade agreements would be honored, and that offers for help would remain open…

  • Una Salus

    I’m sure Obama was totally dedicated to supporting as many deluded Jewish leaders as could be found in all the land. And a merry time was had by all.

    • WalterBannon

      Obama is totally dedicated to bringing about the final genocide of Jews, among other things.

      • Una Salus

        genocide? transformation my friend, transformation

    • Clausewitz

      I’m sure that Obama is praying daily to Allah that he be allowed to be the one who throws the last handful of dirt over a destroyed Israel. Luckily his compatriots are stupid, inept, cowards.

  • Shebel

    Everybody knows that dead Jews have Obama’s full support . It is the live ones that give him sleepless nights.

  • Billy Bob Thornton

    The only nation to use those kinds of weapons are the United States so they have a bad track record. Iran has not attacked any other nation for 200+ years so they don’t have a history of violence. Israel and the US cannot go 6 months without being in a war. Don’t forget that Rumsfeld in the 80’s gave Iraq weapons to attack Iran and vice versa, so the US only plays games when dealing with Arabs and Persians so they are two-faced. Which is why Obama is playing games I feel. He is a warmonger just like Bush. America needs a nationalist party or a socialist party. Obama is an interventionist liberal and a neoliberal.

    • Shebel

      I agree. Obama is a war-monger–also a race monger, a religion monger and a cultural monger.
      At least, I feel, that when he starts his war, it will not be for the benefit of the USA or Democracy.

      • Billy Bob Thornton

        But isn’t that more an ideological difference rather than understanding the man? The fact is most people on the right hate him because of what they are fed rather than what is actually true about him. I agree he is an awful president based on foreign policy and economic policy, but anything said about Obama’s hatred of America is just populist rhetoric. He isn’t anymore hateful than Bush was. Both parties are sellouts to the US and they need a non-interventionist alternative and a party for rejuvenating the US economy. Whether it comes through socialism or nationalism or some other form is definitely something Americans are going to have to want themselves.

    • dance…dancetotheradio

      In your best of both worlds scenario it would seem that America needs a National Socialist Party.

  • JoKeR
  • Brett_McS

    Many a true word spoken in jest …

  • dance…dancetotheradio

    I didn’t read this as satire.

    • Maggat

      I hear you.