“Anti-human activists”: Here’s what the UN gets wrong about discredited “overpopulation” crisis

Brian Lilley reports for TheRebel.media:

When UN climate change bureaucrat Christina Figueres claimed the world has too many people and we need to shrink population, The Rebel called her out on it.

She tried to duck and hide but we bring you the truth about her words, what they mean and the truth about whether there really are too many people on the planet.

  • Ed

    I wonder if she thinks the world has too many bureaucrats, apparatchiks, agitators, community organizers and other hangers on?

    • Justin St.Denis

      Wouldn’t it have been wonderful had someone asked that as a follow-up question?

  • tom_billesley

    The new problem is …Global Spawning.

  • Clink9

    She knows what she has to do then.

  • simus1

    The left wing euro style elites which infest the UN in particular have about the same affection for ordinary white and black first world working people as the nazis had for the slavs.
    They are just as keen Genocidists, but more “refined and patient” when it comes to methods.

  • MannieP

    Show us the way, Christina Figueres. {Uploading razor blade}

  • J. C.

    None of them are ever willing to lead by example, are they???

  • Justin St.Denis

    Anyone finding themselves alone with this b!tch should know she wants them dead and, therefore, is their enemy.

  • Drunk_by_Noon

    This bitch would have us all swinging from a rope.

    However, she does have a point, but probably not in any way she intends.
    The West, mostly has a zero to negative population growth curve already. Now this is where I say BUT…
    What will we do with 2 BILLION Africans that cannot feed themselves, or a billion or more in Central and South America.
    Anyone want another billion semi-literate Muslims that are the product of 1,500-2,500 years of cousin marriage?
    None of these people will be able to feed themselves and will all want to live in North America, and it won’t be limited to Texas.
    “Camp of The Saints”, baby!

  • k

    1) China has already conquered Tibet
    (because it is out of fresh water + it needs MORE LAND for it’s HUGE POPULATION)
    2) Geomodified food has not been properly tested=straight to market and let the boo-boo’s rise too the surface and let Gov’t pay to fix the problem … the vitamin and mineral content is not as high as in organic… SUPERBUGS have been created that we have to try to figure out how to get rid of…. whole strains of wheat have been ‘ordered’ out of the food chain due to Corporate Profit/Financial Market constraints (other strains affected too)
    3) When the Bible was created most kids did not live to adulthood=Nature’s birth control ……
    now, add the advancement of science= where your first two children can live thanks to modern medicine
    now. add the advancement of technology=where you have tractors to do the field work of 10 children
    *****we can live into our 80’s thanks to medicine and we do not need to have as many children to make society work and we do NOT kill as many people!******
    = medicine and technology has made a more HUMANE way of living
    RC Church has a problem with ideology = it is too idealistic
    People should abstain from sex= natural birth control
    now add medicine to keep all babies alive = too many babies for parents to afford & or mentally capable of handling ….
    add to that all the rapes of women in the 3rd World and outreach keeping all the children alive without giving them homes, education etc = toxic and inhumane
    and add to that….
    everyone living in the state of Texas with every view imaginable=constant war
    When someone comes up with a plan on how you can keep HUGE numbers of people living closely together PEACEFULLY …then I might buy into this …. and do not suggest North Korea as a viable option please

    The RC Church has reverence for LIFE but has failed

  • Georgina

    So is Brian Lilley trying to tell us that not wanting thousands of children to starve to death (as they do now), makes one anti-human?
    Not wanting the seas clogged with waste makes one anti-human?
    Not wanting deforestration (‘cos humans like to breath) makes one anti-human?

    I belong to the generation that went to school when the planet held less than 3 billion people. People were starving and rainforests were being decimated then, surely having 7B+ just makes it worse?

    • Brenda2600

      And the worst part is, YOU BELIEVED EVERYTHING!

    • Clink9

      Then do the right thing for the planet.

    • So people were starving when the Earth’s population was c. 3 billion. People are still starving when the Earth’s population is c.7 billion. Solution? Fewer people! And then…. wait a minute….

      Maybe you’re assuming a causality connection which does not exist.

      • tom_billesley

        The only direct connection would be Soylent Green.

        • Clink9

          She should make her way to the processing plant. Lead by example.

  • simus1

    The icing on the cake:
    Today there was a mass Canadian mailing (in TO at least) from the UN’s child care sewer and celebrity employer of last resort, UNICEF, advising that the perfect Mother’s Day gift for dear old mom would be a cash contribution in her name to guess who? To help them increase their care for children in various third world shit holes.

  • disqus_W6sfZCiOd8

    Yes, an “imagined crisis” is exactly what she’s spewing.