New York Times: Opposition to Obama’s Iran Deal is Racist

Also obviously the Confederacy, because the New York Times has decided that Congress is not part of the Federal government.

“It is a peculiar, but unmistakable, phenomenon: As Barack Obama’s presidency heads into its twilight, the rage of the Republican establishment toward him is growing louder, angrier and more destructive.”

Is this because…

A. Obama has decided to govern unilaterally, ignoring Congress, while ramming through major policies such as amnesty for illegal aliens, and completely ignoring the results of the 2014 election

B. Because they’re racist racists

  • Hard Little Machine

    I didn’t know half insane bigoted Jew hating genocidal fucktard was a ‘race’. Live and learn.

  • DMB

    When ever the radical left can not articulate a counter argument for a position they take they immediately revert to name calling usually racist as in this case, homophobic as in the case of Kathleen Wynne calling people who oppose her sex education circulation, Islamaphobic, etc.

  • Uncle_Waspy

    Republican rage? They could destroy the Democrats with the Amnesty issue alone, but they won’t. They seem perfectly content to play second banana.

  • Jade

    My cat is biracial and she is Kocher. When did Judaism and Islam become a race??

    • Jan Morrissy

      Cats are the best 🙂

    • Frau Katze

      Cute kitty!

  • JoKeR
  • Norman_In_New_York

    It has reached the point that whatever the Times says is bad has to be good by definition.