Elder of Ziyon: In Idiotic Editorial, New York Times Prioritizes Iranian Pride and Jobs Over Israeli Concerns

While many, many newspapers, from both the left and the right, are publishing strong reservations about the Iranian nuclear deal, the New York Times is firmly in line with the Obama administration – and even more in line against Binyamin Netanyahu.

Which causes some interesting logical inconsistencies:

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel has gone into overdrive against a nuclear agreement with Iran. On Monday, his government made new demands that it claimed would ensure a better deal than the preliminary one that Iran, President Obama and other leaders of major powers announced last week. The new demands are unrealistic and, if pursued, would not mean a better deal but no deal at all.

…As outlined on Monday by Yuval Steinitz, Israel’s minister of intelligence and strategic affairs, the Israelis are now insisting that Iran end all research and development on advanced centrifuges, which are used to enrich uranium; reduce the number of operating centrifuges at its Natanz plant beyond what was agreed to in the framework; and close its underground enrichment facility at Fordo. Also, Israel has demanded that Iran allow inspections “anywhere, anytime” by international monitors, ship its stockpile of enriched uranium out of the country and disclose past nuclear-related activities that might involve military uses.

In any negotiation, there could never be a deal without compromise. It would be preferable if every vestige of Iran’s nuclear program were eradicated. But that was never going to happen, not least because Iran’s know-how could never be erased.

Iran’s leaders would not accept a deal in which they did not maintain some elements of a nuclear program tailored for energy and medical purposes — not weapons. Ultimately, Mr. Obama had to make many judgment calls in getting a deal that would prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon.

Read more…

unnamed-4Obama sounded very different in 2008. Graphic by Elder of Ziyon

  • Obama and the democrats are traitors.

  • Xavier

    Obama is a lying Moslem sack of shit.

    • Frau Katze

      He sure changed after he was re-elected in 2012.

      • DavidinNorthBurnaby

        More of that “flexibility” he promised the Rooskies once he didn’t have to fool an electorate anymore..

    • Minicapt

      He competes with Mohammed for the title “The Perfect Example”?